Following the April 6 battle in India’s Dantewada district where the People’s Liberation Guerrilla Army killed 76 security personnel, activist and author Arundhati Roy in the following interview stands by her sympathy for the Communist Party of India (Maoist) that she expressed in her important article, “Walking With The Comrades“, about her visit with the Maoist guerrillas in their forest base areas.
Subscribe via RSS
Unity & Struggle
Harsh Thakor on The Quest for the Truth About… Tom Burke on Prisoner of the U.S. empire: C… mark h on Electoral Politics: Imperialis… mark h on Electoral Politics: Imperialis… Mike E on Electoral Politics: Imperialis… Mike E on Electoral Politics: Imperialis… carldavidson on Electoral Politics: Imperialis… The Marxist-Leninist on Electoral Politics: Imperialis… Stansfield Smith on Electoral Politics: Imperialis… Mike E on Electoral Politics: Imperialis… benoît Élie on Norman Bethune: “Wo… Bill Johnson on Communist Party of Greece (KKE… B S Raju on Long Live the Universal Contri… willy bravo on New People’s Army wipes… Mat on Who are the one percent? - Marxism-Leninism Study Guide
- Study Guide: Overview of Marxism-Leninism, the Science of Revolution
- Against Trotskyism: A Reading Guide
- Stalin and the Chinese Revolution
- In Response to Mike Ely: The Elephant in the Room
- Long Live the Universal Contributions of Comrade Joseph Stalin
- Study Guide: Ideological Struggle Against Revisionism
- The Chinese Economy in 1978
- Study Guide: Philosophical Viewpoint and Method - Dialectical and Historical Materialism
- What about Slavoj Žižek?
Fight Back! News
National Democratic Front of the Philippines- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
Colombia Action Network- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Network to Fight for Economic Justice- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Index
anti-revisionism Anti-War / Anti-Intervention Armed Struggle Barack Obama Class Struggle Colombia Communist Party of the Philippines CPGB-ML CPN-Maoist crisis economic crisis FARC-EP Fight Back! Freedom Road Socialist Organization FRSO Gaza Imperialism Israel Lenin Mao Maoist Thought National Democratic Front of the Philippines National Liberation national oppression national question Nepal New People's Army Palestine People's War PFLP Philippines political economy political prisoners Prachanda Protracted People's War Revolution Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia - People's Army self-determination Socialism Stalin Students for a Democratic Society theory Trade Unions video ZionismBlog Stats
- 1,023,351 hits
Workers and Oppressed Peoples of the World, Unite!



















Given the history of the naxalites and India, are we really going to repeat the argument that the maoists are being “forced” to take up arms?
I think the real core of Arundhati Roy’s argument as I understand it is that the Maoist revolution in India’s countryside is a just response to the structural violence inherent in India’s current social system.
Saying that the Maoists “are being forced into violence”, as the title of the video states, is certainly an over-simplification of that.
That’s exactly what she’s saying. And that is true around the world, in all so-called democracies. In America, the middle class is not even served by our democracy any more. We have no voice whatsoever. Voting makes no difference. Corporations and the uber rich run our country, and every other capitalist democracy. It’s time for a new paradigm. I am not a communist, and barely a socialist, but neither am I a capitalist. Our social structure must change to serve the good of the people, not those at the head of the oligarchical political system we have now.
That excactly is the issue..nature of our democracy. Noam Chomsky uses the word ‘Deficit of Democracy’ What we have is democracy for the rich and deficit for the ordinary and poor. We need to organise this struggle on this basis, so that we can avoid the words ‘communist’, ‘socialist’ etc . Both the Democrats and GOP in their time have used these words to abuse their opponents.
I think Roy does excellent work when she’s red-baited by turning the problem, again, to the “structural violence” of Indian state terrorism.
@Mike Ely: You can’t expect her to have perfect politics. She’s far form a liberal, though, in respecting resistance as a means to counter violence.
I say short of quoting the Naxalites and Maoists themselves (who do need it, by the way), this is very good coverage of pro-resistance and anti-imperialist line. Again, not perfect, but it is more than welcomed in my book.
The Indian revolution is based on the same thing as any genuine people’s revolution: the just violence of the oppressed against the unjust violence of the oppressors. It has always been that way. It will be that way until classes disappear and the world reaches the higher stage of society, communism.
Note the resistance of the Adivasi peoples is the resistance of an essentially classless society, e.g., primitive collectivism. Every mode of production short of socialism exists today in India: primitive collectivism, slavery, feudalism (the bulk of India’s population lives under feudalism), and capitalism. The Indian revolution will shake the world. We must be aware that it is based on other people’s struggles as well as the struggle of the working class against the bourgeoisie.
India also has also name-only oppressor-class “communist” parties. They fight alongside the exploiting classes against the people’s revolution. Let’s not be misled by what they call themselves.